Beta Lessons and practice sets are still being reviewed. If something looks wrong, check it against your textbook. Send feedback.

← Practice bank

P/S 05 · Psychophysics and signal detection

Thresholds and Decisions

Interpret absolute and difference thresholds, Weber’s law and signal detection data.

Passage

Psychophysics is the study of how physical stimuli relate to the sensations they produce. The absolute threshold is the lowest intensity of a stimulus that a person can detect, usually defined as the intensity detected on half of the trials. The difference threshold, or just-noticeable difference (JND), is the smallest change in a stimulus that a person can detect. According to Weber’s law, the JND is a constant fraction of the starting intensity. Signal detection theory adds that detecting a faint stimulus depends on two things: the person’s sensitivity to the signal, and the person’s response criterion, which is how much evidence the person needs before saying that the signal is present.

Part 1. In a hearing experiment, 40 adults listen through headphones to short bursts of a tone at different intensities, in a quiet room. On each trial they say whether they heard the tone. Table 1 shows the percentage of trials on which the tone was reported at each intensity.

Table 1. Detection of a tone at different intensities.

Tone intensity (dB)Percentage of trials with a ‘yes’ response
05
1020
2050
3080
4098

Part 2. In a second experiment, participants lift a standard weight and then a comparison weight and report whether the second one felt heavier. The researchers find the smallest difference that participants detect on 75% of the trials. Table 2 shows the JND for three standard weights.

Table 2. Difference thresholds for lifted weights.

Standard weight (g)JND (g)
1002
2004
4008

Part 3. In a third experiment, the tone from Part 1 is set to a faint, constant level, and it is presented on half of the trials. On the other half of the trials, only background noise is presented. Participants say ‘yes’ if they think the tone was present. A hit is a ‘yes’ on a trial with the tone, and a false alarm is a ‘yes’ on a trial without it. Across three conditions, the researchers change only the pay-off for responses. In the neutral condition, correct answers are worth the same. In the liberal condition, a hit is worth more than a correct rejection. In the conservative condition, a false alarm is penalized heavily. Table 3 shows the results.

Table 3. Hit and false alarm rates in three pay-off conditions.

ConditionHit rate (%)False alarm rate (%)
Neutral7015
Liberal9040
Conservative455

The researchers point out that the participants’ ability to separate the tone from the noise, as measured by a statistic that combines the hit and false-alarm rates, is about the same in all three conditions. They also note that all participants were tested in a quiet room, with no distracting sounds, and that the order of the three conditions was varied across participants.

Questions

Question 1 of 6

Based on Table 1, what is the absolute threshold for the tone?

Question 2 of 6

Based on Table 2, what is the JND likely to be for a standard weight of 500 g?

Question 3 of 6

Which statement best describes the principle shown by Table 2?

Question 4 of 6

In Part 3, going from the neutral condition to the liberal condition raises both the hit rate and the false alarm rate. What is the best interpretation?

Question 5 of 6

Which change would be expected in the conservative condition compared with the neutral condition?

Question 6 of 6

A participant who lifts a weight for several minutes stops noticing the pressure of the handle on the skin of the hand. This is an example of: